KAMPALA, Uganda
Overall top diplomats from Western embassies have expressed concern over the trial and continued detention of Uganda opposition leader, Dr Kizza Besigye.
The Observer newspaper has
reliably learnt that the diplomats, especially from the European Union, have
been holding meetings to forge a way of getting Besigye and his co-accused
Obeid Lutale out of jail.
Besigye and Lutale were
abducted in Nairobi and driven back to Kampala before they were arraigned at
the General Court Martial four days later.
Ugandan law requires the state
to produce a suspect in court not more than 48 hours after their arrest. They
are accused of being found with two pistols and ammunition, and seeking to buy
weapons from foreigners in Geneva, Athens and Nairobi.
According to a reliable source
within the diplomatic circles, the diplomats are concerned about the violation
of international laws by Uganda and the decision to have Besigye tried in a
military court.
“They have discussed ways to
push for a solution between government and the opposition, especially
concerning dialogues. But they have not ruled out cutting aid or imposing
sanctions on specific individuals involved in his abduction, arrest and
continued detention,” said the source.
Meanwhile, the diplomats are
said to have discussed Uganda’s political future ahead of the 2026 general
elections in which President Museveni will likely look to extend his 40-year
presidency.
“Diplomatic pressure is
decisive. President Museveni only listens to donors. They have propped his
regime over the years. He can’t ignore diplomats the way he ignores Ugandans.
It is important that the
diplomatic community makes it clear to him that justice for Besigye and other
civilians illegally tried in military courts is their priority,” added the
source.
The donors are already
concerned about the narrowing space of opposition figures, the harsh
legislation against sexual minority groups, and growing levels of corruption in
Uganda.
The donors have shown little
faith in Uganda’s judicial system, and have not been shy to send that message
to the state. Donors have already displayed their displeasure over this by
cutting back on the aid and the issuance of sanctions against certain state
operatives.
In Monday’s appearance before
the General Court Martial, Besigye’s defence contested the competence and
jurisdiction of any military tribunal to try civilians like him.
Eron Kiiza, one of Besigye’s
lawyers, argued that the essence of the defence objection to the jurisdiction
and competence of the General Court Martial to try civilians was captured by
the Constitutional court on December 15, 2022, in the case between Captain Amon
Byarugaba and Others v Attorney General, which declared that the exercise of
jurisdiction by military courts to try civilians for criminal offences is
unconstitutional,” he said.
This is the second time
Besigye is facing trial before the General Court Martial. In 2005, Besigye
appeared before the military court on charges of terrorism and illegal
possession of firearms. He was accused of being behind the shadowy People’s
Redemption Army.
No comments:
Post a Comment