JEDDAH, Saudi Arabia
Sudan’s warring parties have failed to agree on an immediate ceasefire, signaling prolonged fighting even as mediators pushed for a pause and humanitarian corridors.
The outcome of the new round
of Jeddah talks in Saudi Arabia, mediated by the Saudi Kingdom, the US and
regional bloc Intergovernmental Authority on Development (Igad) means there is
no guarantee that the warring sides; Sudan Armed Forces (Saf) and the Rapid
Support Forces (RSF), will be reaching a peace deal soon.
But the co-facilitators of the
talks said they had pushed parties to agree on opening humanitarian corridors
and reopen direct contacts between them.
A dispatch from Igad, however,
did not indicate timelines.
“The co-facilitators regret
that the parties were unable to agree on ceasefire implementation arrangements
during this first round. There is no acceptable military solution to this
conflict,” said a statement issued by the Horn of Africa bloc, Igad which
is taking part in the talks on behalf of the African Union.
[The co-facilitators] are able
to announce that the Saf and RSF have committed to take steps to
facilitate increased humanitarian assistance, and to implement
confidence-building measures (CBMs).”
The mediators announced the
outcome as the RSF accused the Sudan Armed Forces of shelling the Al-Jili
Petroleum Refinery and the sides clashed more. Since April 15 when the war
broke out between two once allied forces, at least 10,000 people have been killed
and more than 5 million displaced from their homes, according to various
independent conflict monitors. The UN said last week the civilian suffering had
worsened over the six-month period, calling for a ceasefire.
In Jeddah, the parties return
to the table had been seen as initial victory, having fallen out in May when
they signed the Jeddah Declaration of Commitment to Protect the Civilians but
violated them.
Igad said the parties, in
spite of failing on ceasefire committed to participate in a joint humanitarian
forum led by the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs “to
resolve impediments to humanitarian access and deliveries of assistance.”
It also said that they agreed
to identify points of contact to assist with movements of humanitarian
personnel and assistance.
They also agreed to implement
confidence-building measures by:
- Establishing communication between
Saf and RSF leaders
- Arresting prison escapees and fugitives
who had broken out of jail assisted by warring factions
- Improve each side’s official media
discourse, and reduction of inflammatory rhetoric
- Tame actions concerning each side’s
warmongers and pro-war elements
No comments:
Post a Comment