By Sam Kiblagat, NAIROBI Kenya
Azimio La Umoja candidate Raila Odinga and his running mate, Martha Karua, filed a petition challenging the outcome of the presidential election at the Supreme Court of Kenya on Monday, claiming the election was manipulated to favour President-elect William Ruto.
Azimio Presidential candidate Raila Odinga and his running mate Martha Karua at Milimani Law Court filling petitions challenging the win of Kenya Kwanza Presidential candidate William Ruto. |
They claim, among other
things, that Dr Ruto did not garner 50 percent plus one vote required for a
candidate to be declared the winner and that the electoral commission chairman
Wafula Chebukati announced the outcome without tallying and verifying results
from 27 constituencies, which would have affected the final tally.
The duo further says the
Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) cannot account for
250,000 votes that were cast, excluding votes cast by voters who voted
manually. The Supreme Court has admitted eight other presidential election
petitions, besides Mr Odinga’s and Ms Karua's with six of them challenging Dr Ruto’s
win.
Mr Odinga and Ms Karua's want,
among others, pray that the IEBC ordered to tally and verify the vote and
declare them President-elect and Deputy President-elect. They also want a
forensic audit of all equipment, system and technology used by the IEBC in the
presidential election and Mr Chebukati declared unfit to hold public office.
Article 140 (2) of the
Constitution provides that a petition should be filed within seven days from
the date the electoral body declares the results.
The petitioners have one day
to serve the respondents with the court documents. The respondents, including
the IEBC, the commissioners and Dr Ruto and Deputy President-elect Rigathi
Gachagua, have until Saturday, August 27 to file their responses.
The petitioners will then have
one day within which to file a rejoinder or interlocutory applications and
responses to the application should also be filed within 24 hours.
Any parties seeking to join
the case as friends of the court will have one day to file and serve their
applications.
The court will hold a
pre-trial conference on the eighth day from the date of filing of the petition,
which falls on Tuesday, August 30.
During the pre-trial
conference, parties agree on issues to be determined by the court. The court
will also give direction on the time allocation for each party.The Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) on Wednesday afternoon submitted all the election forms to the Supreme Court.
Among the issues parties will
address include the jurisdiction of the court; whether there were electoral
malpractices and or irregularities; various declarations or appropriate orders
to be issued and who should bear the costs.
During the hearing of the
presidential election petition filed by the National Super Alliance in 2017,
Chief Justice David Maraga mobilised a team of 18 legal researchers, 15
secretaries and three information technology experts to assist the court.
In normal circumstances, every
Supreme Court judge is assigned two legal researchers but the top court might
increase the number due to the strict timelines.
Also brought in to assist the
court during the 2017 election petition was an IT expert and a university don
to decipher the complex issues on the transmission of results, servers and
public portal, which were at the core of the dispute.
The hearing of the petition
commences immediately after the pre-trial conference and the case should be
determined within 14 days after the filing of the case. The last day the
verdict should be delivered is September 5.
If the court is convinced that
there are sufficient grounds to support claims of irregularities, the judges
will call for a fresh election within 60 days. The seven judges can also
dismiss the petitions and uphold Dr Ruto’s win. Their decision can be unanimous
or by majority vote.
In the 2017 presidential
election petition, the court in a majority of four judges against two ruled
that the IEBC did not conduct the elections as required by the applicable law
and the constitution, rendering it null and void.
They ordered a fresh election,
which was held on October 31, 2017, but Mr Odinga boycotted after his demands
on the electoral process es were not met.
Section 80(4)(a) of the
Elections Act, which was revised in 2016 allows an election court, to direct
IEBC to issue a certificate to the losing candidate after a recount of the
ballots cast finds that the petitioner actually won.
This will make voters avoid a
repeat poll. Speaking in a TV interview, Law Society of Kenya (LSK) president
Eric Theuri said “it will be difficult for the court to grant him [Mr Odinga]
the request if the court found that there were irregularities”. –
Business Daily
No comments:
Post a Comment