Saturday, June 22, 2019

AFCON: NIGERIA EDGE BURUNDI IN GROUP B OPENER

Alexandria, EGYPT
Odion Ighalo came off the bench to score the goal that gave former champions Nigeria a 1-0 victory over stubborn minnows Burundi on Saturday in the opening Africa Cup of Nations Group B match.
The Shanghai Shenhua forward had been on the pitch only four minutes in Egyptian Mediterranean city Alexandria when he struck the 77th-minute winner.
It was an unconvincing performance from the three-time trophy-holders, who lacked attacking sharpness against well-organised opponents.
Bookmakers have made Nigeria fourth-favourites at 9/1 to win the competition, behind hosts and record seven-time champions Egypt, Senegal and Ghana.
Debutants Burundi battled bravely throughout before a small crowd that included four-time African Footballer of the Year Samuel Eto'o from Cameroon, one of the tournament ambassadors.
Burundi, who qualified at the expense of a Gabon team including Arsenal star Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang, lie 89 places below Nigeria in the world rankings.
But they showed no signs of inferiority during the opening half in the ancient city and came closest to breaking the deadlock during the first 45 minutes.
Cedric Amissi darted on to a brilliantly weighted pass and it took a brave parry from perfectly-positioned Nigeria goalkeeper Daniel Akpeyi to prevent a sizzling close-range shot finding the net.
The close shave came just after beanpole Nigeria forward Paul Onuachu had displayed his aerial prowess to force a good save from Jonathan Nahimana.
Nigeria, back at the Cup of Nations after failing to qualify for the last two editions, dominated first-half possession as anticipated but seldom threatened to score.
The Super Eagles fired blanks in two warm-up matches, a draw with Zimbabwe and loss to Senegal, and German coach Gernot Rohr expressed concern ahead of the Burundi clash.
"Players like Alex Iwobi need to score more regularly," he said, referring to the misfiring 23-year-old Arsenal forward.
Iwobi was well policed by a Burundian side known as the Swallows, who were enjoying their debut at the African football showpiece.
Kenneth Omeruo, one of two survivors in the starting line-up from the Nigeria team that won the 2013 Cup of Nations, came close soon after halftime with a header off a free-kick.
As the hour mark approached, Rohr took off veteran captain John Obi Mikel and introduced Ahmed Musa, hoping the pace of the wide attacker could unlock the Burundi defence.
Ighalo, the leading scorer in the qualifying competition with seven goals, later replaced Onuachu and soon broke the deadlock.
A superb pass from Ola Aina set up Ighalo to fire past the onrushing Nahimana and the ball landed in the far corner of the net.

UGANDA END 41-YEAR WAIT FOR AFCON VICTORY

Cairo, EGYPT

Africa Cup of Nations victory when they upset the Democratic Republic of Congo 2-0 on Saturday in a Group A match in Cairo.
The Cranes last won at the showcase of African football in March 1978, defeating Nigeria in a semifinal before losing the title decider to hosts Ghana.
Uganda did not qualify again for the Cup of Nations until two years ago in Gabon when the best they managed in three group matches was a draw.
Uganda exposed poor defending by DR Congo at the Cairo International Stadium to score in each half through Patrick Kaddu and Emmanuel Okwi.
Winning by two goals lifted Uganda to the top of the table, ahead of host nation Egypt on goal difference.
The scene inside the stadium was very different from the previous night when a 70 000 crowd watched Egypt beat Zimbabwe 1-0 in the tournament opener.
With the mid-afternoon temperature 36 degrees celsius (97 fahrenheit), there were just a few thousand spectators to witness the second match in the section.
Ahead of the tournament, most pundits tipped record seven-time champions Egypt to top the standings, leaving DR Congo, Uganda and Zimbabwe in an intriguing scrap for second place.
The six group winners and runners-up are guaranteed round-of-16 places and will be joined by the best four six third-place sides in a tournament expanded to 24 teams from 16 this year.
Uganda did not resemble a team 31 places below DR Congo in the world rankings as they bossed the early exchanges and deservedly went ahead on 14 minutes.
As a corner was floated toward the goalmouth, Kaddu sprinted away from a marker and his glancing near-post header flew past goalkeeper Ley Matampi.
It proved the only goal of an opening half in which Uganda were hungrier to win and retain possession than two-time champions DR Congo.
The Congolese regularly struggled to deal with aerial threats during the opening 45 minutes and this weakness was punished again as Uganda scored a second goal on 48 minutes.
A free-kick was directed toward a crowd of players just inside the box and Okwi, facing away from the goal, flicked the ball into the corner of the net.
Uganda could have scored again just before the hour mark as a medium-range Farouk Miya free-kick dipped belatedly and Matampi did well to flick the ball over the bar.
DR Congo coach Florent Ibenge sensed changes were necessary to try and turn the tide and Jonathan Bolingi and Jacques Maghoma were introduced.
Bolingi justified his introduction by heading on to the top of the crossbar and over with 20 minutes left, the closest the Congolese came to a goal. - Africa

LIBERIA AT CRITICAL JUNCTURE FOLLOWING MASS PROTEST

MONROVIA, LIBERIA 
“I'm finding life difficult for my children,” says Precillia Dehme, 33. The mother-of-three has a dry goods stall near Monrovia’s old airfield. She voted for Africa’s greatest footballer-turned Liberian president, George Weah, in 2017 but is beginning to regret her choice.


“All the prices have gone up in the market. We don’t know what’s going on in the country. My president is doing nothing for me, so I won't be voting for him again.”

An estimated 10,000 people attended an anti-government protest in Monrovia on June 7. It was sparked by anger about increasing economic hardship and a feeling that President Weah’s government is not doing enough to tackle rising inflation – currently the fourth highest in Africa.

“The current team is incapable of managing the economy,” says Henry Costa, a radio talk show host who played a leading role in organizing the protest. “We believe they should be fired and replaced by people who have a demonstrated track record of competence.”

Not everyone has turned against Weah, who warned that “our economy is broken [and] our government is broke” in an address to the nation shortly after he took office in January 2018.

Thirty-five-year-old money changer Munya Sherif doesn't blame the president for the country’s economic difficulties.

“All the problems in this country were caused by the past government,” he says. “We need to give this government a chance to do their work. Some people think that George Weah is not able to run this country, but I believe that if they give him a chance he can do better.”

The protest organizers are a group of opposition and civil society activists who call themselves the Council of Patriots. They have issued a long list of demands, including extensive reform programs.

Top of the list, according to Costa, is a demand for Weah to disclose his assets, which he has so far declined to do in spite of mounting suspicion surrounding private construction projects undertaken since he assumed office.

“We want to know what he had before becoming president, how he is able to build so many properties and acquire new ones in a relatively short period of time when he didn't do that before coming to power,” says Costa.

The Council of Patriots is threatening further protests if the government fails to act on their demands within a month.

President Weah has reacted by calling for a national roundtable to hear the views of the opposition, civil society and religious leaders on how best to revive the economy. Eugene Nagbe, the Minister for Information, says the dialogue will be the extent of the government’s response to the protesters.

“As Liberians they have a right to make their views clear,” Nagbe told VOA. “But as a government our response is a nationalistic one, a general one and this is why Mr. President recognized that there are alternative views and because of the alternative views he said come to the table so that we can have a discussion.”

Costa dismisses the call for dialogue as “a theatrical move.

“We don’t need a dialogue for the president to publish his assets. What are we going to dialogue about? We want action taken and we will not rest until we compel him to act.”

Dr Edwin Gbargaye, a lecturer in Economics and Public Administration at the University of the Liberia, considers the solution to be clear-cut: “Good governance is the best way out. Minimize corruption and make sure that food and basic necessities are in the homes of Liberians.”

Talks have started with the International Monetary Fund about a program intended to promote better governance and transparency. But until the effects of this trickle down to ordinary citizens and basic goods become more affordable, the protests against President Weah are likely to continue.

“We are not denying that there is a serious economic crisis,” says government spokesman Nagbe, “but we are putting in place the right measures to fix it. We are approaching the IMF discussions with an open mind. We recognize that there have to be reforms not just in the fiscal and monetary areas but also generally in how we carry out governance.”- Africa

AFCON FAVOURITES EYE TANZANIA SCALP

Cairo, EGYPT
Senegal will be aiming to make the perfect start to their quest of clinching 2019 Africa Cup of Nations glory when they take on Tanzania in the group C opener at 30 June Stadium in Cairo on Sunday evening.

The Teranga Lions head into this year's showpiece as the top ranked team on the African continent - 22nd in the world - and along with hosts Egypt, favourites to clinch what would be a maiden Afcon crown.

Senegal have yet to win Africa's premier tournament, most notably losing to Cameroon in the 2002 final.

The West African's, though, will fancy their chances of finally bringing African glory to the Senegalese people with Liverpool's Sadio Mane and Napoli centre-back Kalidou Koulibaly leading their charge.

Senegal, though, will be without Mane for their clash against Tanzania. The forward is serving a one-match ban after being yellow-carded twice during qualifying for this year's tournament.

Head coach Aliou Cisse, though, is confident Senegal will be able to cope without their main man.

"His absence should not in any way bother us," said Cisse, who was part of the squad that lost in the final 17 years ago. "Certainly the presence of Sadio is beneficial, but without him we remain strong,"

Tanzania return to the African showpiece for the first time in 39 years. The Taifa Stars, who are coached by former Afcon champion Emmanuel Amunike, qualified for a first Afcon competition in almost four decades after finishing behind Uganda in qualifying.

Ranked at 131st in the world, Tanzania are among the lowest ranked teams heading into the tournament but with star forward Mbwana Samatta in their ranks, they could cause an upset or two. Samatta scored 32 goals in 51 appearances for Genk this past season. - Africa

Friday, June 21, 2019

UN SLAMS SUDAN PROTESTERS FOR ATTACKING DARFUR

KHARTOUM

United Nations peacekeepers said Friday that a group of protesters looted and destroyed several properties of the World Food Programme and aid agency World Vision in Sudan's war-torn region of Darfur this week.
Sudanese protesters burn tyres as demonstrations against the military council continued in Bahri, on the northern outskirts of Khartoum on June 20, 2019.

The "dangerous attacks" were carried out on June 19 and 20 in the town of Graida in the state of South Darfur, the joint African Union and UN peacekeeping mission, also known as UNAMID, said in a statement.

It said the mission is "deeply concerned about the looting and destruction of premises and property belonging to the World Vision and World Food Programme".

Protesters ransacked the offices of the two agencies, stole money and damaged vehicles, the statement said without detailing what the group was demonstrating about.

"This behaviour is totally unacceptable, especially the looting and destruction of humanitarian property causing serious disruption to the work of humanitarians providing lifesaving assistance to the most vulnerable people of Graida," Gwi-Yeop Son, UN chief for Sudan said in the statement.

UNAMID chief Jeremiah Mamabolo decried the limited support given to the UN "in the face of such dangerous attacks that inevitably place the lives of its staff and local citizenry at risk in Sudan."

This week's attacks in Graida come just weeks after a similar incident in El-Genina in the state of West Darfur, the statement said.

"Such wanton destruction of UN property and assets cannot continue with impunity," Mamabolo said, adding that it was the responsibility of Sudanese authorities to protect all UN staff and its properties inside the country.

The UN peacekeepers have been deployed in Darfur since 2007 after a brutal conflict erupted in the region four years earlier.

Darfur's ethnic African rebels took up arms against the then Arab-dominated government of now ousted leader Omar al-Bashir, accusing it of marginalising the region economically and politically.

The United Nations says the conflict has left more than 300,000 people dead and 2.5 million displaced.

Bashir, who is now held in a prison in Kober, has been charged by the Hague-based International Criminal Court with genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity for his alleged role in the conflict. He denies the charges.

Over the years the violence in Darfur has subsided and the peacekeeping mission too has been downsized. - AFP

HONG KONG PROTESTERS DISPERSE AFTER BLOCKADING POLICE HEADQUARTERS

HONG KONG

Thousands of protesters who had blockaded police headquarters in Asia’s leading financial center had mostly dispersed by Saturday morning with some roads reopened for traffic as normal but it remained unclear whether further mass protests would take place.


Hong Kong has been bracing for a third weekend of widespread protests against an extradition bill that has plunged the Chinese-ruled city into crisis, posing the greatest popular challenge to President Xi Jinping since he took power in 2012.

On Friday groups of mostly students wearing hard hats, goggles and face masks set up roadblocks and trapped vehicles in a generally peaceful protest to demand that leader Carrie Lam, who promoted and then postponed the bill, scrap it altogether.

Police removed barricades early on Saturday morning while staff were able to go home, after a more than 15 hour blockade. Only a few hundred protesters remained.

In a statement early on Saturday, police said the acts of the protesters had seriously affected their work including the provision of emergency services to the public.

“Police have shown the greatest tolerance to the protesters...but their means of expressing views have become illegal, irrational and unreasonable. Police will stringently follow up on these illegal activities.”

Hong Kong returned to Chinese rule in 1997, since when it has been governed under a “one country, two systems” formula that allows freedoms not enjoyed in mainland China, including a much-cherished independent judiciary. - Reuters

AFCON 2019: THE PHARAOHS EDGE ZIMBABWE WARRIORS 1-0

Cairo, EGYPT
Egypt secured a 1-0 victory over Zimbabwe in the 2019 Africa Cup of Nations (Afcon) Group A match at the Cairo International Stadium in Egypt on Friday.
The Pharaohs dominated the match from the start and Edmore Sibanda was a busy man in the Warriors goal-posts.
The South Africa-based goalkeeper cleared two dangerous balls from Mohamed Salah which were played in the Zimbabwe box in the opening stages of the game.
Sibanda then made two decent saves to deny Egypt duo Abdallah El Said and Salah as pressure mounted on the Zimbabwe defence.
However, the Warriors looked dangerous on the counter-attack and they had a chance to score through Khama Billiat.
The Kaizer Chiefs forward was sent through on goal from a quick free-kick, but he was brilliantly denied by Mohamed El Shenawy in the Egypt goal-posts.
Zimbabwe were left to rue that missed chance as Egypt took the lead through Trezeguet, whose full name is Mahmoud Ahmed Ibrahim Hassan.
The Turkey-based attacker beat his marker, before firing past Sibanda to make it 1-0 to Egypt in the 41st minute.
The Pharaohs continued their dominance after the restart, but they were frustrated by Sibanda, who was having a good match.
The experienced shot-stopper made two great saves to deny Trezeguet and Salah in the first five minutes of the second half.
Egypt's main striker, Marwan Mohsen, was also denied by Sibanda from close range just before the hour-mark as pressure mounted on Zimbabwe.
The Warriors threatened against the run of play with 14 minutes left on the clock, but Ovidy Karuru's long-range shot was well-saved by El Shenawy.
The Warriors suffered a blow in the closing stages of the game as Sibanda went down injured and was replaced by fellow keeper Elvis Chipezeze.
Chipezeze pulled off a brilliant low save to deny Salah and, ultimately, the match ended in a 1-0 victory in favour of the tournament hosts who contained Zimbabwe in the dying minutes of the game. - Africa
Egypt (1) 1 (Trezeguet 41')
Zimbabwe (0) 0
Egypt: Mohamed El Shenawy, Hegazi, Alaa, Ashraf, El Mohamady, El Said (Warda 71'), Hamed, Elneny, Trezeguet (Donga 81'), Salah, Mohsen (Soliman 60').
Zimbabwe: Sibanda (Chipezeze 80'), Darikwa, Hadebe, Lunga, Karuru, Mudimu, Nakamba, Munetsi, Mushekwi (Rusike 81'), Billiat, Musona (Chawapiwa 85').

FIFA IS TAKING OVER AFRICAN SOCCER LEADERSHIP

Cairo, EGYPT


On Thursday, the worst-kept secret in African football was confirmed by no less than the President of the Confederation of African Football (CAF), Ahmad Ahmad.

With journalists from around the world gathered in Cairo for the Africa Cup of Nations, Ahmad revealed that CAF's executive committee had requested FIFA's intervention in its administrative processes.
Consequently, FIFA Secretary General Fatma Samoura would now be designated general delegate for Africa and would work with Ahmad as well as a team of experts to, among other things, oversee a forensic audit of CAF. Ahmad ended by reassuring the media that there was "no one better than FIFA to help".
An official statement released later provided greater detail: Samoura would begin working with CAF on August 1 and continue till January 31 next year. Then, the statement added, there would be the option to extend her stewardship at the discretion of both CAF and FIFA.
Fatma Samoura, the new boss
Beyond the audit, she would "help to conclusively accelerate the implementation of the ongoing reform process destined to ensure that CAF functions with transparency, efficiency while abiding to the highest governance standards".
Ahmad is currently under investigation by FIFA's ethics committee and has been in the eye of the storm over allegations of corruption, financial misappropriation and sexual harassment.
Earlier this month, he was detained by the French police for questioning over allegations of corruption, but was released without charge.
The allegations relate to a deal brokered by French company Tactical Steel - owned by an allegedly close friend of Ahmad's aide Loic Gerand - for the purchase of equipment at a significant mark-up from the price which had been quoted by German sportswear giants Puma.
There have also been allegations of abuse of power in the summary dismissal of former CAF General Secretary Amr Fahmy, while many raised their eyebrows when it was revealed that Ahmad had paid for a number of African football association heads to undertake the hajj pilgrimage.
Most recently, CAF had to deal with a tricky situation involving the CAF Champions League final, which ended in controversy in Tunis.
Defending champions Esperance were handed the trophy, but only after opponents Wydad Casablanca refused to carry on playing after a second-half goal was ruled out.
With the video assistant referee (VAR) equipment unavailable due to logistical bottlenecks, a situation Wydad claimed they were unaware of, it was impossible to review the contentious decision.
It led to a standoff on the pitch, with Ahmad himself seeking to mediate, but after an hour-long wait, the Moroccans forfeited.
That decision, which was in line with CAF's rules, was set aside four days later in favour of a replay on "neutral" ground, with the executive committee citing inadequate security in the second leg in Tunis.
This led to Tunisian Prime Minister Youssef Chahed referring to CAF's handling of the situation as a "farce".
It was a development with potentially far-reaching consequences, not least of which is the insistence of both teams of their rectitude, which could lead to complicated legal proceedings.
It could also inflame tensions at the Africa Cup of Nations: in the eventuality that Morocco and Tunisia meet at some point, there is a concern that relations between rival supporters could be strained to a breaking point.
More importantly, CAF's unwillingness to honour its own rules and laid-down procedures undermines its credibility as a governing body.
The Office of the Swiss Attorney General is currently investigating several cases of corruption in FIFA. Earlier this month, a Swiss federal prosecutor was forced to recuse himself after failing to disclose two private meetings held with FIFA President Gianni Infantino.
President of the Confederation of African Football (CAF), Ahmad Ahmad.
Therefore, despite FIFA's careful moves, the sporting body has not entirely purged itself of suspicion. Whether it can do a proper job of helping a clean-up of CAF remains to be seen.
The reactions to the FIFA move have been swift and damning. The inference that CAF is unable to handle its own affairs and deal with its problems internally is one that is "a massive slap in the face of African football", according to journalist and African football expert, Mark Gleeson.
"It retards a lot of the progress that has been made over the years and just goes to show how important good administration is to the game," said Gleeson.
"As footballers have gotten better, the administrators have gotten poorer."
Critics also believe the FIFA move is an indictment on those entrusted with the responsibility to govern the continent's football.
CAF's 22-member executive committee has the power to solve the problems of African football, according to Osasu Obayiuwana, a lawyer and journalist. He insists on the implications of a FIFA intervention in the running of the African game are grave.
"It is the responsibility of those 22 men to solve the problems of African football. If they are unable to do so, it says a lot about the quality of leadership African football has," Obayiuwana told Al Jazeera.
There are reports that there was no unanimity within the executive committee concerning FIFA's intervention. It is also unclear how Ahmad and Samoura will make their partnership work.
Experts said it seemed like a lifetime ago when Ahmad had swept to office on the back of tremendous goodwill, much of which is now eroded. By making CAF effectively a satellite of FIFA, they say, he has taken African football into uncharted territory. - Africa


WORLD BANK TO TRAIN TANZANIA ON BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT


Dodoma, Tanzania

The government of Tanzania has invited World Bank experts so they can train officials involved in the improvement of business environment as East Africa’s second largest economy seeks to improve its standing in the ease of doing business.

The Minister of State for Investment, Angellah Kairuki, told the Parliament on today, June 21, 2019 that the government was doing everything possible to boost Tanzania’s standing in World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business reports.

The annual reports which measure the performance of countries in 11 factors that affect businesses command respect among international investors who use them in making investment decisions.

“I want to assure the parliament and Tanzanians in general that our country’s standing in Doing Business reports will improve. We have invited experts from the World Bank so they can train our focal points and what they are required to do to improve the business environment. We did it in the year 2006 and in 2007, we improved significantly,” Ms Kairuki told the Parliament.

She said during the past few days, she had held discussions with World Bank officials in Dar es Salaam and Washington DC and discussed the topic comprehensively.

Ms Kairuki was responding to a question from Rukia Ahmed (Chadema) which was asked on her behalf by the opposition chief whip, Mr Joseph Selasini (Rombo).

In her key question, Ms Ahmed wanted to know when will the government remove obstacles to doing business and attract local and international investors.

According to Ms Kairuki, though the government has undertaken a number of reforms in its 2019/20 budget, they will not have an impact in this year’s World Bank Report because the deadline for reforms to be tracked and accommodated in a particular year’s report is May.

“So we expect that the reforms that we have made this time will feature in the report that will be availed next year and in 2021. We remain hopeful that we will improve significantly,” she said.

Responding to Ms Ahmed’s question, the Deputy Minister for Education, Science and Technology, William Ole Nasha said the government was undertaking several reforms in line with the Blueprint for regulatory reforms to improve the business environment in Tanzania which was approved by the cabinet during the 2017/18 financial year.

He said in line with the Blueprint, the government has scrapped a total of 114 fees and charges from those payable to operators in the agriculture and livestock sectors.

Tanzania’s ranking in the World Bank’s Ease of Doing reports has been unsatisfactory during the past few years.

Last year, the country performed poorly in cross-border trade, scoring 20.21/100, followed by resolving insolvency at 39.04/100 and protecting minority investors in which it scored 45/100.

The country moved 7 positions down, from 137 in 2017 to 144 in 2018. The WB measures the regulations of 190 countries affecting key areas of the life of a business, including getting electricity, getting credit, starting a business, dealing with construction permits, registering property, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency and labor market regulation.


Thursday, June 20, 2019

THE FIGHT TO CONTROL AFRICA’S DIGITAL REVOLUTION


By David Pilling

Already this year, at least six governments in Africa have shut down the internet, often with the complicity of western providers. This month in Sudan, as soldiers from a government paramilitary force went on a killing spree in the capital Khartoum, the internet went dark, preventing protesters from documenting the violence on social media.

By the end of it, more than 100 people had been killed and many more assaulted. With the flick of a switch, an opposition protest movement that had just weeks before used social media to organise the overthrow of Omar al-Bashir, a dictator of 30 years’ standing, was reduced to the secret meetings and safe houses of the pre-internet age.

That is a particularly graphic example of the power of new technology both for progressive change and for its opposite. But all over Africa, the double-edged nature of digital technology is becoming increasingly apparent. Take the social activists in the Democratic Republic of Congo who use online activism to try to keep their crooked government on the straight and narrow, but find themselves plunged into digital darkness when poll results are being cooked up.

On the face of it, an internet shutdown in Africa seems less noteworthy than one in Europe, China or North America, where the use of online technology is more widespread. Internet penetration in Africa — while rising more rapidly than elsewhere — is still just 37 per cent, against 61 per cent in the rest of the world. 

Yet in some ways, Africans are more dependent on internet and smartphone technologies than people elsewhere. Nigeria has gone from 100,000 working fixed-line phones in the early 2000s to 170m mobile subscribers today.

In a country with potholed, hazardous roads, the internet is not so much an alternative highway as the only one. Hundreds of millions of Africans use cellular services to transfer money to their family or to pay for goods and services.

In the absence of a universal banking system, if the mobile network goes down, the impact can be devastating.

Similarly, in countries with heavily controlled print media, the internet becomes the only source of reliable information — as well as one of rumour and deception. In a cat-and-mouse game, Tanzania’s authorities have sought to tax bloggers out of existence by imposing exorbitant fees.

Uganda has put a daily tax on the use of platforms, such as Facebook, Twitter and WhatsApp, to curb what the government deems “idle chatter”. More important even than the fragility of physical infrastructure is institutional and regulatory frailty.

Consumers in advanced economies are only now waking up to the dangers posed by technology to their privacy and freedom.

In Africa, companies are still at the stage of what Kenyan writer Nanjala Nyabola calls “a mass data sweep” in which information about an expanding consumer class is being busily devoured. Even governments may be vulnerable.

Technicians working at the African Union headquarters in Addis Ababa in 2017 noticed that peak data usage in the building occurred every night between midnight and 2am.

A report in Le Monde, vehemently denied by Beijing, said data from the heavily bugged headquarters — a gift from the Chinese government — was being downloaded to Shanghai every night. Many African countries are now almost wholly reliant on Chinese companies, including Huawei, for their digital services.

Transsion, a Shenzhen-based handset maker, sells more phones in Africa than any other company. It has even begun manufacturing in Ethiopia.

Many Chinese companies, including ZTE and Hikvision, provide the surveillance technology used by African governments to monitor — or spy on — their own populations. CloudWalk Technology, a Guangzhou start-up, last year signed a deal with the government of Zimbabwe to provide a mass facial recognition programme.

Zimbabwe will send data on millions of its citizens, captured by CCTV cameras, to the Chinese company, which hopes to improve technology that still struggles to distinguish between black faces.

Ms Nyabola, whose book Digital Democracy, Analogue Politics explores these tensions in her native Kenya, paints a picture in which the benefits and hazards of new technology are finely poised. On the plus side, she says, citizens regularly tag politicians and judges on Twitter, demanding an accountability unthinkable even a few years ago.

The contest is often evenly matched. In the run-up to the 2017 presidential elections, the electoral commission’s head of technology was found murdered. When the all-electronic system began to spit out results, citizens posted paper ballots online in an effort to expose what they suspected was wholesale fraud.

In the end, the Supreme Court — a piece of kit invented in the 18th century — took the bold decision to order a rerun of the whole election. The incumbent won anyway.  “Using technology as a substitute for trust creates this black box,” says Ms Nyabola.

“But most of us don’t understand how these systems are built. So what comes out is just chaos.” 

Governments in Africa have a massive opportunity to use the digital revolution to improve the lives of their citizens. Too many are using it against them.

KIM JONG UN WELCOMES XI JINPING IN PYONGYANG

Xi and Kim wave to people as the motorcade heads to the Kumsusan Palace of the Sun in Pyongyang, North Korea.
Kim and Xi walk past the honor guard at Pyongyang International Airport in Pyongyang.
Kim, center right; his wife Ri Sol Ju, right; Xi, center left; and his wife Peng Liyuan pose for a photo at Kumsusan guest house in Pyongyang, North Korea

CAMEROON, NIGERIA QUALIFY FOR KNOCKOUT OF 2019 WOMEN'S WORLD CUP


Africa has two teams in the knockout stage as final day of group fixtures produces high-tempo games and outcomes.

Cameroon qualified by playing and winning against New Zealand but Nigeria only had to look on as Thailand, the whipping girls of the tournament, thwarted Chile in a 2 – 0 loss.

Nigeria’s hopes of qualification were in the balance at the start of two games in Group E and F. The first being Cameroon vs. New Zealand, which saw Cameroon go through.


In the case of the second of Thailand vs. Chile, the Chileans had it all to do but it took a resolute Thai side to hold off the onslaught and help Nigeria through by so doing.

Three Cameroon goals in a 2 – 1 victory. Three points in a tense match that went down to the wire. The winner of Cameroon vs. New Zealand was scored 11 seconds to the end of the game.

The lioness that led the indomitable feat being two-goal heroine Nchout Ajara, who also bagged the player of the match award for her performance.

An African representative makes it to the knockout stage of the tournament. Ajara’s 57th minute lead was cancelled by an own goal on the 80th minute by a Cameroonian defender.

Ajara will cap the day’s performance with a stoppage time strike that sends Cameroon through by virtue of superior goals over another African side, Nigeria. - Africa

TRUMP APPROVES STRIKES ON IRAN, BUT THEN ABRUPTLY PULLS BACK


Washington

President Trump approved military strikes against Iran in retaliation for downing an American surveillance drone, but pulled back from launching them on Thursday night after a day of escalating tensions.
Sources: Drone locations from the U.S. Department of Defense and the Iranian Foreign Ministry. Boundaries from Marine Regions and Flanders Marine Institute.


As late as 7 p.m., military and diplomatic officials were expecting a strike, after intense discussions and debate at the White House among the president’s top national security officials and congressional leaders, according to multiple senior administration officials involved in or briefed on the deliberations.

Officials said the president had initially approved attacks on a handful of Iranian targets, like radar and missile batteries.

The operation was underway in its early stages when it was called off, a senior administration official said. Planes were in the air and ships were in position, but no missiles had been fired when word came to stand down, the official said.

The abrupt reversal put a halt to what would have been the president’s third military action against targets in the Middle East. Mr. Trump had struck twice at targets in Syria, in 2017 and 2018.

It was not clear whether Mr. Trump simply changed his mind on the strikes or whether the administration altered course because of logistics or strategy. It was also not clear whether the attacks might still go forward.

Asked about the plans for a strike and the decision to hold back, the White House declined to comment, as did Pentagon officials. No government officials asked The New York Times to withhold the article.

The retaliation plan was intended as a response to the shooting down of the unmanned, $130 million surveillance drone, which was struck Thursday morning by an Iranian surface-to-air missile, according to a senior administration official who was briefed on the military planning and spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss confidential plans.

The strike was set to take place just before dawn Friday in Iran to minimize risk to the Iranian military and civilians.

But military officials received word a short time later that the strike was off, at least temporarily.

The possibility of a retaliatory strike hung over Washington for much of the day. Officials in both countries traded accusations about the location of the drone when it was destroyed by a surface-to-air missile launched from the Iranian coast along the Gulf of Oman.

Mr. Trump’s national security advisers split about whether to respond militarily. Senior administration officials said Secretary of State Mike Pompeo; John R. Bolton, the national security adviser; and Gina Haspel, the C.I.A. director, had favored a military response. But top Pentagon officials cautioned that such an action could result in a spiraling escalation with risks for American forces in the region.

Congressional leaders were briefed by administration officials in the Situation Room.

The destruction of the drone underscored the already tense relations between the two countries after Mr. Trump’s recent accusations that Iran is to blame for explosions last week that damaged oil tankers traveling through the strait, the vital waterway for much of the world’s oil. Iran has denied that accusation.

Iran’s announcement this week that it would soon breach one of the key limits it had agreed to in a 2015 pact intended to limit its nuclear program has also fueled tensions. Mr. Trump, who pulled the United States out of the 2015 pact, has vowed that he will not allow Tehran to build a nuclear weapon.

On Thursday, Mr. Trump insisted that the United States’ unmanned surveillance aircraft was flying over international waters when it was taken down by an Iranian missile.

“This drone was in international waters, clearly,” the president told reporters on Thursday afternoon at the White House as he began a meeting with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada. “We have it all documented. It’s documented scientifically, not just words.”

Asked what would come next, Mr. Trump said, “Let’s see what happens.”

Iran’s government fiercely disputed the president’s characterization, insisting that the American drone had strayed into Iranian airspace. Iran released GPS coordinates that put the drone eight miles off the country’s coast, inside the 12 nautical miles from the shore that Iran claims as its territorial waters.

Majid Takht-Ravanchi, Iran’s ambassador to the United Nations, wrote in a letter to the Security Council that the drone ignored repeated radio warnings before it was downed. He said that Tehran “does not seek war” but “is determined to vigorously defend its land, sea and air.”

Congressional Democrats emerged from the president’s classified briefing in the Situation Room and urged Mr. Trump to de-escalate the situation. They called on the president to seek congressional authorization before taking any military action.

“This is a dangerous situation,” Speaker Nancy Pelosi said. “We are dealing with a country that is a bad actor in the region. We have no illusions about Iran in terms of their ballistic missile transfers, about who they support in the region and the rest.”

Iran’s destruction of the drone appeared to provide a boost for officials inside the Trump administration who have long argued for a more confrontational approach to Iran, including the possibility of military actions that could punish the regime for its support of terrorism and other destabilizing behavior in the region.

But in his public appearance, Mr. Trump initially seemed to be looking for a way to avoid a potentially serious military crisis. Instead of directly accusing the leaders of Iran, Mr. Trump said someone “loose and stupid” in Iran was responsible for shooting down the drone.

The president said he suspected it was some individual in Iran who “made a big mistake,” even as Iran had taken responsibility for the strike and asserted that the high-altitude American drone was operating over Iranian air space, which American officials denied.

Mr. Trump said the episode would have been far more serious if the aircraft had been a piloted vehicle, and not a drone. It made “a big, big difference” that an American pilot was not threatened, he told reporters.

Last year, Mr. Trump pulled the United States out of the 2015 nuclear pact with Iran, over the objections of China, Russia and American allies in Europe. He has also imposed punishing economic sanctions on Iran, trying to cut off its already limited access to international trade, including oil sales.

Iran has warned of serious consequences if Europe does not find a way around those sanctions, though it has denied involvement in the attacks on tankers near the vital Strait of Hormuz. On Monday, Iran said it would soon stop abiding by a central component of the nuclear deal, the limit on how much enriched uranium it is allowed to stockpile.

Both Washington and Tehran said the downing of the drone occurred at 4:05 a.m. Thursday in Iran, or 7:35 p.m. Wednesday in Washington. The drone “was shot down by an Iranian surface-to-air missile system while operating in international airspace over the Strait of Hormuz,” the United States Central Command said in a statement. “This was an unprovoked attack on a U.S. surveillance asset in international airspace.”

Iran’s ability to target and destroy the high-altitude American drone, which was developed to evade the very surface-to-air missiles used to bring it down, surprised some Defense Department officials, who interpreted it as a show of how difficult Tehran can make things for the United States as it deploys more troops and steps up surveillance in the region.

Lt. Gen. Joseph Guastella, the Air Force commander for the Central Command region in the Middle East, said the attack could have endangered “innocent civilians,” even though officials at Central Command continued to assert that the drone was over international waters. He said that the closest that the drone got to the Iranian coast was 21 miles.

Late Thursday, the Defense Department released additional imagery in an email to support its case that the drone never entered Iranian airspace. But the department incorrectly called the flight path of the drone the location of the shooting down and offered little context for an image that appeared to be the drone exploding in midair.

It was the latest attempt by the Pentagon to try to prove that Iran has been the aggressor in a series of international incidents.

Iran’s foreign affairs minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, said in a post on Twitter that he gave what he said were precise coordinates for where the American drone was targeted.

“At 00:14 US drone took off from UAE in stealth mode & violated Iranian airspace,” he said in a tweet that included coordinates that he said were near Kouh-e Mobarak. “We’ve retrieved sections of the US military drone in OUR territorial waters where it was shot down.”

Mr. Trump’s comments on Thursday afternoon in the Oval Office reflected the longstanding tension between the president’s desire to be seen as tough on the world stage and his campaign promise to make sure that the United States did not get tangled in more foreign wars.

The president has embraced a reputation as someone who punches back when he is challenged. Only months into his tenure, Mr. Trump launched 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles at an air base in Syria after a chemical weapon attack.

But he has often talked about ending American involvement in long-running conflicts abroad, describing his “America First” agenda as having little room for being the world’s police force. In a tweet in January, he said he hoped that “Endless Wars, especially those which are fought out of judgement mistakes” would “eventually come to a glorious end!”

According to Iranian news media, a foreign minister spokesman there said that flying a drone into Iranian airspace was an “aggressive and provocative” move by the United States.

Hossein Salami, the commander in chief of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, said crossing the country’s border was “our red line,” the semiofficial Mehr news agency reported.

“We are not going to get engaged in a war with any country, but we are fully prepared for war,” Mr. Salami said at a military ceremony in Sanandaj, Iran, according to a translation from Press TV, a state-run news outlet. “Today’s incident was a clear sign of this precise message, so we are continuing our resistance.”

Iranian news media said the drone had flown over Iranian territory unauthorized, and reported that it had been shot down in the Hormozgan Province, along the country’s southern coast on the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman.

Both the United States and Iran identified the aircraft as an RQ-4 Global Hawk, a surveillance drone made by Northrop Grumman.

“This was a show of force — their equivalent of an inside pitch,” said Derek Chollet, a former assistant secretary of defense for international security affairs during the Obama administration, speaking of Iran’s decision to shoot down the drone.

James G. Stavridis, who retired as a four-star admiral after serving as the supreme allied commander at the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, warned that the two countries were in a dangerous game that could quickly spiral out of control. He described Iran’s downing of the drone, which costs about $130 million, as a “logical albeit highly dangerous escalatory move by Iran.” - The New York Times