BRUSSELS, Belgium
The ongoing conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has recently reached a turning point, with the United Nations officially acknowledging the role of the Rwandan army and the M23 rebel group in the occupation and looting of parts of the country.
In a historic resolution
passed today, the UN held both the Rwandan military and the M23 responsible for
the escalating crisis.
The European Union has, at
last, recognized this undeniable truth. But for many, the question remains: why
did it take so long?
Thierry Mariani, a Member of
the European Parliament, pointed out that this reality has been well known for
some time, yet the EU has remained slow to act.
He raised concerns about the
long-standing political ties between Rwanda and the EU, suggesting that a
“friendship” or lobbying efforts within the Union may have contributed to the
delay in addressing the issue.
Mariani pointed to reports
calling Rwanda the "darling" of the European Union, asking why the EU
regularly criticizes African nations for flaws in their democratic processes
while simultaneously praising Rwanda, where President Paul Kagame won his
latest election with a controversial 99.13% of the vote.
Mariani emphasized that the
European Union has finally begun to take action, condemning President Kagame
and, importantly, implementing trade restrictions against Gazebo Gold
Refinery—a company linked to Rwanda that is involved in selling looted minerals.
However, Mariani expressed
doubt that these actions will be enough to resolve the underlying issues. “The
message to Rwanda and President Kagame is clear: you have been exposed. If you
want to restore your image, you must withdraw from the DRC,” he said.
The M23 rebel group, which has
been accused of occupying parts of the DRC with support from Rwanda, remains a
central issue. According to Mariani, there is no longer any debate about
whether the M23 is a terrorist group with ties to the Rwandan government.
This fact is now widely
accepted by both the European Union and the United Nations. Despite this,
Mariani believes that Rwanda and the M23 may still think they can resolve the
situation through negotiation.
However, he made it clear that
sovereignty and territorial integrity are non-negotiable.
The conflict in the region,
Mariani noted, has been ongoing for more than 30 years, and recent developments
have only added to the instability.
In particular, he criticized
the agreement signed between the European Union and Rwanda on February 19,
2024, which he believes has only fueled the continuation of the conflict.
He argued that the agreement
offers no guarantees and expressed hope that it will no longer be enforced,
even if it hasn’t been officially revoked. Mariani also pointed out that the
main Rwandan partner involved in the deal is now under sanctions, which he
views as a step in the right direction.
Drawing a parallel with the
international response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Mariani suggested that
the time has come for the European Union to consider sanctions against Rwanda’s
leadership.
“When Russia attacked Ukraine,
sanctions were imposed swiftly. The same approach must be applied here,” he
said.
While Mariani acknowledged
that it may have been wise to avoid immediate sanctions, he emphasized that if
the looting, occupation, and violence continue, the EU must direct sanctions at
the primary instigator—Rwanda’s President Paul Kagame.
As the European Union begins
to take stronger actions, the future of the conflict in Congo remains
uncertain.
However, for many observers,
the message is clear: the EU can no longer turn a blind eye to the actions of
Rwanda and its role in the ongoing instability in the DRC.
No comments:
Post a Comment